These arts have a lot in common, such as:
- Force directing down into opponent to destroy the structure (crane flies down the mountain)
- Punching forward into the chest/torso with elbows down and tuked in close to the body
- Rolling of the shoulders slightly forward to deploy the large back muscles for power
- extreme close quarters distancing -> every step forward into the opponent
Last Friday we explored another interesting set of material. Using the karambit, we did Jun Fan traps 1-5 and found that we can have great effect using almost the identical movements that we did using our empty hands. Why? Aren't Jun Fan and karambit (silat) completely different?? Yes, but also no.
Of course their martial traditions come from very different cultural sources. That said, however, the In donesians were influenced by the Hakka Chinese in the same way as the Malays and Filipinos, and there is a strong fundamental connection between tem all. Additionally, they both can and do operate at extreme close range, relying on trapping and misdirection to gain entry to the opponent's centerline/vital box. I hope the similarities were not lost on the students.
Jun Fan into CQB Silat
Another interesting branch to the same tree can be found in following Jun Fan traps with Silat finishes.
While many KM students are more familiar with Silat being used for lowline sweeps and takedowns aimed at the knees/ankles/legs, Silat also includes a lot of elbows, knees, headbutts, neck cranks, and other close range weapons that fit well with the distancing of Jun Fan trapping. many of the same principles apply:
- Get in quickly
- Tie-up opponent's primary weapons (arms)
- Stay inside the vital box/Keep opponent outside the vital box
- Attack the structure/Weaken the base